T20 or Twenty 20 cricket has been a huge hit amongst fans and has revolutionized the world of cricket over the past couple of decades. Ever since it was introduced in 2003, it has given a new lease of life to many cricket associations through the franchise-based cricket model bringing in money that could sometimes fund a country for years. Indian Premier League, Big Bash League, Caribbean Premier League and others have changed the way cricket is followed and watched across the world. These T20 tournaments have not only helped bring more revenue but has also helped unleash new talent.
T20 was introduced to spice up the cricketing fraternity. With growing popularity, every governing body has tried to add more spice to their T20 tournaments, to make it more interesting and appealing for fans across the world. As a traditionalist who still loves watching test cricket, I found it very hard to take a liking to T20 and some of these new rules I believe can help revive the interest in other forms of cricket. Listing some of those rules that clicked with me and some that did not.
2 different team sheets: In IPL 2023, the captains can walk out with 2 different team sheets and can select a XI based on the outcome of the toss. This takes away the “Win toss, Win Match” trend in the IPL. This makes sense especially when the condition of the match is affected by the dew factor, making it easier for the team batting second to chase targets. Extending this rule to International cricket across all formats, especially One Day Cricket, would make a great difference. This rule would surely be a hit.
Impact Substitute: Each team can nominate a set of 5 players and choose to replace a player at different stages of the game like the end of the innings, the end of an over, the fall of a wicket, or when a player retires. Once the impact player is used, the substituted player can play no further part in the game even as a fielder. My take on this rule is that this takes away the benefit of having 2 different team sheets and also in many instances, an impact player who replaced a player who already got out, got a chance to bat again. This makes no sense. The T20 game is already spiced up and loaded in favour of batters. Interestingly, Big Bash League got rid of this change which was introduced in the name of “X-factor”. I believe this rule would be a great fit for test cricket, played over 5 days and with changing conditions, bringing this rule will increase the interest in Test cricket.
DRS for wides and no-balls: DRS or Decision Review System is now available for teams to review wides and no-balls. Earlier the teams were allowed to only review when someone is adjudged out or not out. The number of reviews has also been increased from 1 to 2. These changes make a lot of chance. T20 is a game of very fine margins and a wide ball or a no-ball can make a world of difference. But some more clarity on how to decide on the wide or no-ball especially when the batter moves around the crease would be very beneficial to the teams and the spectators. This rule should stay for sure.
I was also impressed with a couple of new changes that were brought in the Big Bash League(BBL) in Australia.
Power Surge: A separate 2-over powerplay that can be used by the batting team after the completion of one-half of the overs. This was a really interesting rule and kind of added uncertainty to the way the game was played. This rule was done away with. But I would prefer this to come back but for the power surge to be taken by the bowling team rather than the batting team to give it a little twist.
Bash Boost: This one once again makes the contest more interesting. The calculation is fairly simple whichever team has the higher score midway through the second innings gets a bonus point. This would make a good equation in the points table. A good contest will get additional points for the teams.
Some rules that would make test cricket and ODIs more interesting are something that I would like ICC – International Cricket Council to consider.
5 thoughts on “Revamping T20 Cricket: The New Rules and Their Impact”
Well researched and very well written! Shows the author’s passion towards the sport
thanks for the feedback.
I agree that the impact sub and 2 team sheets is an over kill. Also that impact sub will be a good one for test cricket.
I also think that DRS for wides and no balls is a time waste and could be left to the 3rd umpire to decide – similar to over stepping no balls. It’s doesn’t take long to do a quick check and revert to the on field umpire.
DRS for wides and no-balls seems to be a time-wasting tactic similar to how keepers attempt a stumping and the umpires check for caught behind. I feel that that on-field umpires would have no job other than counting balls then.
I think technology has moved the game and limited umpires involvement. We haven’t tailed LBW with technology so that’s still a key role for umpire. Other than that keeping the decorum and pace of the game are their roles. Everything else technology is able to do it. So for all you know we may not need umpires eventually. Never know.
I recently saw Ashwin s live video where he takes fan questions with Analyst Prasanna. One of the questions was on how umpires prep for the matches. He mentioned that Kumar Dharmasena (and others as well) comes to practices sessions, stand as umpires and watches bowlers bowl to gauges their angle and bounce for impact on pitching or hitting wickets. They talk to them on how to identify their variations like Carrol ball or straighter one etc. They use that in their decision making as some of the practice wickets mimic the actual match wickets. Didn’t know that but makes sense as the nature of the wicket determines how the ball would behave in terms of pitching in line or hitting the wicket or not.